*Opinions expressed in this post are of my own and in no way reflect that of ACRES or Love Wildlife Foundation (LWF). The place I work at will be simply referred to as ‘The Facility’ to protect its reputation. If you do already know where I work at now, your confidentiality is requested. Some details are intentionally left vague to protect The Facility.
We were all seated around an old-fashioned wooden table in the Meeting Room of The Facility. Representatives from the construction crew were excused from this part of the meeting. I was seated beside the owners of The Facility. On the opposite side was the vet, the manager of animal husbandry and food, the crocodile keeper-in-charge collaborating with an international NGO, the landscape manager as well as the General Manager of The Facility. The confrontation was about to begin…
Before I go into the session, let me try and give everyone a brief background of what has been happening. I have been based in Laos for a month and a half now as the representative on the ground from ACRES & LWF, which are based in Singapore and Bangkok, Thailand respectively. My task for our conservation project here is further split into components:
1. Attend meetings with Laos governmental officials to expedite the necessary documents for the success of our project.
2. Network and forge relationships for future partnerships and fund-raising opportunities. This involves other NGOs in the region and corporate representatives.
3. Assess The Facility to come up with a formal business plan that will significantly improve the welfare of animals, as well as work in line with the principles of ACRES & LWF.
4. Understand the magnitude and shortcomings of the animal welfare and conservation scene here in Laos in order to have a more targeted approach when a renewed version of The Facility is ready.
I split my time between the village in which The Facility is located in and Vientiane capital. While at The Facility, I concentrate on surveying the welfare of the animals there, taking photographs, notes and coming up with possible solutions. All this is conducted with the help of my indispensable Bike Friday foldable bicycle which I brought from Singapore, after having received a generous 50% sponsorship from My Bike Shop SG.
The following is a summarized chronology of my time here:
Week 1:
This was my first complete week of surveys of the animals’ welfare. The staff were unsuspicious as the purpose of my stay was not communicated to everyone. This suited me as I went about recording the staff acitivities and taking photographs. 3 animals died within the first 2.5 days of my survey.

This was a major shock to me. I wasn’t taken seriously when I gave very subtle suggestions to help the animals. Suggestions include the most basic things like providing animals with clean water… Or relocating macaques, civets and pythons out of bird cages and meshed chicken coops.
Suspicious behaviour was noticed after working hours on one occasion, after which an animal went missing the following morning.
Week 2:
After returning from 3 days of meetings and time off in the capital, I found myself locked out of areas in The Facility. This included the gate leading from The Facility to my own house. I was shocked and annoyed at their attempts to control and monitor my movement. 

A fence was also built within that 3 days to deny me access to an area with animals that required the most attention. My alternative access was now in plain view of all the staff. This infuriated me even further, not because it was a directed action against me, but because of their ability to build a fence but inability to improve the lives of the animals. When I did eventually got into my house, my water supply was cut.
Week 3:
An Immediate Action Plan complete with pictures was written by me and addressed to the owners of the facility as a recommendation to rectify faults that did not cost money or time, only effort. In my opinion, more animals would be dead if they weren’t executed immediately. A full survey would be too late. The owners of The Facility flew into Laos within the week to listen to my opinions and had a talk with the staff. I made a specific request for the owners to make their visit unannounced, which did send everyone scrambling upon their arrival. The fence was also immediately taken down without request during the surprise visit. Very unfortunately, it was hinted that the staffs’ jobs would be at stake. I knew this did not necessarily bode well for me.
Week 4:
Everyone was understandably more cautious of me, watching me as I took pictures. They gave me a little more attention when I asked questions, but nothing significant. By this time, I kept my drinking water indoors to avoid it from being tampered with. My Bike Friday is always locked indoors. I had 3 padlocks which I swapped for my house when I’m not around and I sleep with 3 Swiss Army knives in 3 strategic places in my house. (Fine, this may be paranoia, but I think its legitimate? I’ve heard stories of events at another facility in Cambodia that did not end well.)
I started getting invited for dinners and drinking sessions in which they insisted I partake any Beer Lao or rice wine offered. Call it a curse or a blessing, but any possible attempts to get me drunk have failed. My liver is well-conditioned.
Week 5:
Everyone started acting unnaturally cooperative towards me. I got occupied by other components of the project outside The Facility, and could not focus as much on the animals there. The owners were coming back for another visit anyway, which brings us back to The Confrontation…
So we were all seated there… And the owners requested a self-introduction from all 5 of them. He wanted to know their roles, the number of years they’ve been working here and what they envisioned The Facility to be. The owners then started his/her pep talk, starting with the broadest scope of the role of The Facility on a regional level… And slowly zooming in on their important roles that have not been fulfilled satisfactorily.
Do keep in mind that all this happened in the Lao language, so the only interpretation was from body language and the bits and pieces of words I recognised.
The owners pulled out the copy of the Immediate Action Plan and pictures of the animals that I had submitted to them. There was no denial, but the vet started sounding very defensive and raised his voice… The other 4 bowed their heads and looked awkward. The vet made eye contact with me… And then a lot of waving and pointing went in my direction. At one point he mimicked me taking photographs of the animals. I sat there and firmly stared back at them, I was not apologetic and I knew that what ever they wanted to say, it couldn’t possibly defend them from their complete lack of effort to house animals humanely.
The confrontation ended. I was later given a very censored and brief summary of the session by the owners, which I didn’t totally appreciate. However, it was probably for the better. I don’t think I should be unnecessarily intimidated, not when I am still vastly outnumbered and don’t know the language.
The most important thing that resulted from it all was that the 5 of them now have exactly 1 month to prove themselves. Otherwise, drastic action will have to be taken. 

For now, at least this stump-tailed macaque juvenile is taken out of his old bird cage that he had been living in for at least the past 4 months. He is now in an adjacent cage 4 times its size and closer to the ground. Funds for a brand new enclosure are coming in.
Things obviously aren’t ideal now, but it will be as close to it as I can help it to be. At least there is a light in sight for them.